The master-slave model in data processing is a paradigm that has played a fundamental role in the development of modern technologies and industrial networks. The origins of the model date back to the early 20th century. In the master-slave model, a central control unit (the master) manages tasks and distributes them to the slave nodes for processing. This architecture provides a structured framework for communication between different devices and enables optimized performance and faster data processing through the parallel processing of commands. The master-slave model has become the standard in modern fieldbus and Real-Time Ethernet networks, particularly due to the ever-increasing workloads of industrial networks over time.
The master node not only manages task planning and load balancing but also serves as a communication center for the slave nodes. Each slave device communicates independently with the master controller, which is essential for maintaining a robust and responsive network.
The terminology of the master-slave model is criticized as it evokes associations with historical slavery and is perceived as inappropriate. Particularly in sensitive social and scientific contexts, non-discriminatory language is required in order to promote diversity and inclusion. In automation and communication technology, particularly in the field of fieldbuses, a more neutral terminology is therefore increasingly gaining acceptance. The terms “controller” and “device” in particular are increasingly preferred nowadays, as they describe the hierarchical control structure in a technically precise way and without potentially negative connotations. Companies such as Hilscher, one of the global leaders in the field of industrial communication, are gradually replacing the traditional terminology with the terms controller and device. This change reflects a general awareness of respectful and inclusive language.